$35,441.63 speaking Payment -- AstraZeneca to Dr. Stephanie King

Payment Details

AI-Powered Analysis of This Payment

The following analysis was generated by artificial intelligence to help patients understand the context, significance, and implications of this pharmaceutical payment. This analysis is not medical or legal advice.

AstraZeneca made a $35.4K speaking payment to Stephanie King, a Oncology specialist in City, WA. The payment was associated with Entresto. AstraZeneca paid Dr. Stephanie King $35,441.63 for speaking engagements. The payment was for serving as faculty or a speaker, related to Entresto. This payment occurred on October 10, 2025.

Patient Guidance: What This Payment Means for You

Patients should be aware that their healthcare providers may receive compensation from pharmaceutical companies for educating others about medications. Always discuss your treatment options with your healthcare provider and ask about alternatives.

Payment Context: Is This Amount Normal?

Payments for speaking engagements can vary widely, but this amount may be considered moderate to high for an Oncology specialist depending on the frequency and nature of the engagements.

Regulatory Context: Sunshine Act Requirements

This payment falls under the Sunshine Act provisions, requiring disclosure of payments made by manufacturers of drugs, devices, and biologics to physicians and teaching hospitals.

Related Topics

This payment is related to the following healthcare transparency topics:

• speaking-fees
• speaker-programs
• pharmaceutical-payments
• oncology
• astrazeneca
• entresto

Understanding speaking Payments

Speaking and education payments compensate physicians for presenting at conferences, continuing medical education (CME) events, and promotional speaking engagements. These payments often cover honoraria, preparation time, and travel expenses. Speaking fees are among the highest-value payment categories and have attracted significant attention from researchers studying potential conflicts of interest.

Frequently Asked Questions About This Payment

What was this $35.4K payment for?

This was a speaking payment of $35.4K from AstraZeneca to Stephanie King, categorized as "Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker". It was associated with Entresto. The payment was reported under the Sunshine Act (CMS Open Payments).

Does Stephanie King accept pharmaceutical money?

Yes, Stephanie King received this $35.4K payment from AstraZeneca. Under the Sunshine Act, pharmaceutical companies must report all payments to physicians exceeding $10. You can view Stephanie King's full payment history on the CMS Open Payments database or on this site.

Is it legal for doctors to accept pharma payments?

Yes, it is legal for physicians to receive payments from pharmaceutical companies. The Physician Payments Sunshine Act (2010) requires transparency by mandating that companies report all payments exceeding $10 to CMS. These payments include consulting fees, meals, travel, speaking fees, and research grants. The law does not prohibit payments but ensures public disclosure.

Should I be concerned about this speaking payment?

A speaking payment of $35.4K should be evaluated in context. Payment does not imply wrongdoing, but patients have the right to ask their doctor about pharmaceutical relationships.

How do I talk to my doctor about pharma relationships?

You can ask your doctor directly: "Do you receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?" and "Does this affect which medications you prescribe?" Most doctors will answer honestly. You can also verify payment data yourself through CMS Open Payments (openpaymentsdata.cms.gov). Consider asking about generic alternatives and whether the prescribed medication is the best option regardless of manufacturer relationships.

What types of pharma payments are most concerning?

Ownership interests and large consulting/speaking fees are generally considered more significant than meals or small educational grants. Research payments typically fund clinical studies and are common in academic medicine. The total volume and concentration of payments from a single company may be more telling than any individual payment. Patterns matter more than individual transactions.

Does pharma money affect what my doctor prescribes?

Research shows that even small payments can influence prescribing behavior. Studies published in JAMA Internal Medicine found that physicians who received meals costing as little as $20 were more likely to prescribe the promoted brand-name drug. However, many physician-industry interactions are legitimate professional activities. The key is transparency and awareness.

How does this compare to other doctors in Oncology?

To compare this payment against Oncology averages, check the full specialty breakdown on CMS Open Payments. Payment amounts vary widely by specialty and type. Oncology physicians may receive payments for consulting, speaking, or research that are standard for the field. Individual payments should be evaluated in the context of the doctor's full payment history.

What does this payment reveal about Stephanie King's relationship with AstraZeneca?

The payment amount is substantial for a single speaking engagement. This $35.4K speaking payment is part of the transparency data reported under the Sunshine Act.

Is this payment amount typical for Oncology?

The payment is categorized as 'Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker'.

What should patients do after learning about this payment?

Patients should be aware that their healthcare providers may receive compensation from pharmaceutical companies for educating others about medications.

What else should I know about this speaking payment?

The drug mentioned, Entresto, is associated with the payment.

Related Reports

• View Dr. Stephanie King's full payment report
• AstraZeneca full spending report
• Browse all Oncology payments
• Browse all payments in Washington
• Search for other payments