Pulmonology Pharmaceutical Payments in Minnesota
This page provides a detailed analysis of pharmaceutical industry payments to Pulmonology physicians practicing in Minnesota. Combining specialty and geographic data reveals how pharmaceutical companies target specific types of doctors in particular regions.
Pulmonology Payment Summary in Minnesota
- Total Payments: $275,393.67
- Total Transactions: 42
- Number of Pulmonology Doctors: 42
- Average Per Physician: $6,556.99
Understanding Pulmonology Payments in Minnesota
Minnesota has 42 Pulmonology physicians who have received pharmaceutical industry payments totaling $275,393.67. The average Pulmonology doctor in Minnesota receives $6,556.99 in pharmaceutical payments, which patients can use as a benchmark when evaluating their own doctor's payment profile.
Payment patterns for Pulmonology specialists in Minnesota are influenced by the presence of academic medical centers, research hospitals, and the density of pharmaceutical company operations in the state. States with major teaching hospitals and clinical trial sites tend to have higher per-physician payment averages.
Top Pulmonology Physicians in Minnesota by Pharma Payments
The following Pulmonology physicians in Minnesota have received the highest total pharmaceutical payments:
| Physician | City | Total Payments | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Brown | City | $119,252.57 | 1 |
| Gregory Evans | City | $24,018.60 | 1 |
| Richard Brown | City | $18,436.55 | 1 |
| Jessica Moore | City | $13,126.63 | 1 |
| Benjamin Cook | City | $10,630.09 | 1 |
| Scott Collins | City | $8,267.52 | 1 |
| Amy Phillips | City | $7,712.38 | 1 |
| Amy Phillips | City | $7,140.38 | 1 |
| Joseph Carter | City | $6,437.24 | 1 |
| Laura Hall | City | $5,677.00 | 1 |
| Eric Sanchez | City | $4,888.70 | 1 |
| Andrew Young | City | $4,857.61 | 1 |
| Maria Martinez | City | $4,320.98 | 1 |
| John Anderson | City | $3,974.95 | 1 |
| Catherine Morris | City | $3,635.35 | 1 |
| Laura Hall | City | $3,619.35 | 1 |
| David Kim | City | $3,431.73 | 1 |
| Amy Phillips | City | $3,319.32 | 1 |
| Patricia Davis | City | $2,726.62 | 1 |
| Eric Sanchez | City | $2,676.64 | 1 |
| Rebecca Adams | City | $2,572.67 | 1 |
| David Kim | City | $2,271.07 | 1 |
| Michael Rodriguez | City | $1,994.46 | 1 |
| Christine Edwards | City | $1,907.43 | 1 |
| Christine Edwards | City | $1,385.79 | 1 |
Pulmonology Payments by City in Minnesota
Geographic breakdown of Pulmonology pharmaceutical payments within Minnesota:
- City: 42 physicians, $275.4K total
Frequently Asked Questions
How much pharma money do Pulmonology doctors in Minnesota receive?
Pulmonology physicians in Minnesota have received $275,393.67 in pharmaceutical payments across 42 transactions. There are 42 Pulmonology doctors in Minnesota who have received payments, with an average of $6,556.99 per physician.
Which Pulmonology doctors in Minnesota receive the most pharma payments?
The top Pulmonology physician in Minnesota by pharmaceutical payments is Richard Brown in City, with $119,252.57 in total payments. See the full ranking above.
Is my Pulmonology doctor's pharma payment amount normal for Minnesota?
The average Pulmonology physician in Minnesota receives $6,556.99 in pharmaceutical payments. If your doctor's payments are significantly above this average, it may warrant a conversation about their financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies. However, payment does not imply wrongdoing.
Which cities in Minnesota have the most Pulmonology pharma payments?
The top city for Pulmonology pharmaceutical payments in Minnesota is City with $275.4K in total payments. Cities with major medical centers and teaching hospitals typically receive more pharmaceutical industry payments.
How does Minnesota compare to other states for Pulmonology pharma payments?
Visit the Pulmonology specialty page to see national comparisons, or browse the States page to compare Minnesota with other states for overall pharmaceutical payment volumes.
Related Reports
Data from CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act). Payment does not imply wrongdoing. AI analysis is not medical or legal advice.